Film effects

While talking to J- today about film effects, I stumbled onto the Digital Air site, a firm that deals with digital manipulation of multiple cameras, and I thought it was quite cool how they described and demonstrated the various effects possible.

Which made me think: how much of our acceptance of even basic effects involving time in films (fast forward, reverse, etc.) is based on our experience of them, simply because film-watching (or film fast-forwarding/rewinding?) is such a common part of modern life? Did we have to learn to accept time effects as being a natural vocabulary of films, or was that innate? I mean, they are so obviously artificial, but at this point it's hard for me to even think of fast forward, reverse, etc as being "special effects" at all - they're just part of the language of films, like jump-cuts (although of course even jump cuts can be special, for instance the famous Lawrence of Arabia jump-cut).

In fact, how much did we have to learn to accept films, to distinguish them from reality? I think about those (possibly apocryphal) stories of people watching The Great Train Robbery and running from the theatre screaming... yet I think even 5-year-olds these days know the difference between film and reality.

Going back to the virtual camera idea, I was thinking what it would be like if you could use that multiple-camera + computer setup for live sporting events. Not just for dramatic effect as in a finish line, but let's say to judge the difference between diving and being legitimately foulled by viewing it at any conceivable angle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

English words that are borrowed from Malay

50 Cent's crib